Global examples can be of different types.
Replicable : Programme which is already implemented
and shows impact.
Innovative : Programme which is innovative (We cant
gurantee that it never existed before)
Using technology : Programme which has used technology
(including AI) to save time, money, reachout
Sustainable : Programme which exists minimum for 5
years
No gurantee (but read till end to see great people)
Our former organisation did a research on credibility
of NGOs and we realised that it takes lot of time
to do research with NGO, its community and associated
donors, volunteers, related government people. Also,
we realised that many times, if founder leaves the
organisation or if the CEO of the organisation leaves,
the credibility suffers. We have also seen that the
new CEO has shown better performance or has easily
left ageold practices or used technology better to
move faster or with digital practices saves time,
as well as saving petrol / diesel and helped climate
....
Donors : Programme must see the credibility, intent,
purpose of financial donor (No gurantee).
Corruption : Programme implementing organisation does
not use corrupt practices with donors / government
(We can not give gurantee and donor should known who
was the donor of the organisation they are helping)
Impact : While we are keen on impact, we know that
there are many locations where the reachout is difficult
and the community members are far less. So it is not
economical, but government helps such locations and
here, they do not consider impact in traditional way,
but they think they needed to take care of citizens
or trees or houses (typically in forest fires or drought
areas or floods or earthquakes or locations like mines)
No one should ask or request for sharing their programmes
in global examples.
We either do it ourselves or take the help of larger
(bigger as well as global) organisations and donors
Corporates : We do not share corporate examples, corporates
Awards
We do not recommend any one for any award
|
