Global examples can be of different types.
Replicable : Programme which is already implemented and
shows impact.
Innovative : Programme which is innovative (We cant gurantee
that it never existed before)
Using technology : Programme which has used technology (including
AI) to save time, money, reachout
Sustainable : Programme which exists minimum for 5 years
No gurantee (but read till end to see great people)
Our former organisation did a research on credibility of
NGOs and we realised that it takes lot of time to do research
with NGO, its community and associated donors, volunteers,
related government people. Also, we realised that many times,
if founder leaves the organisation or if the CEO of the
organisation leaves, the credibility suffers. We have also
seen that the new CEO has shown better performance or has
easily left ageold practices or used technology better to
move faster or with digital practices saves time, as well
as saving petrol / diesel and helped climate ....
Donors : Programme must see the credibility, intent, purpose
of financial donor (No gurantee).
Corruption : Programme implementing organisation does not
use corrupt practices with donors / government (We can not
give gurantee and donor should known who was the donor of
the organisation they are helping)
Impact : While we are keen on impact, we know that there
are many locations where the reachout is difficult and the
community members are far less. So it is not economical,
but government helps such locations and here, they do not
consider impact in traditional way, but they think they
needed to take care of citizens or trees or houses (typically
in forest fires or drought areas or floods or earthquakes
or locations like mines)
No one should ask or request for sharing their programmes
in global examples.
We either do it ourselves or take the help of larger (bigger
as well as global) organisations and donors
Corporates : We do not share corporate examples, corporates
Awards
We do not recommend any one for any award
|
