Global examples can be of different types.
Replicable : Programme which is already implemented and shows
impact.
Innovative : Programme which is innovative (We cant gurantee
that it never existed before)
Using technology : Programme which has used technology (including
AI) to save time, money, reachout
Sustainable : Programme which exists minimum for 5 years
No gurantee (but read till end to see great people)
Our former organisation did a research on credibility of NGOs
and we realised that it takes lot of time to do research with
NGO, its community and associated donors, volunteers, related
government people. Also, we realised that many times, if founder
leaves the organisation or if the CEO of the organisation
leaves, the credibility suffers. We have also seen that the
new CEO has shown better performance or has easily left ageold
practices or used technology better to move faster or with
digital practices saves time, as well as saving petrol / diesel
and helped climate ....
Donors : Programme must see the credibility, intent, purpose
of financial donor (No gurantee).
Corruption : Programme implementing organisation does not
use corrupt practices with donors / government (We can not
give gurantee and donor should known who was the donor of
the organisation they are helping)
Impact : While we are keen on impact, we know that there are
many locations where the reachout is difficult and the community
members are far less. So it is not economical, but government
helps such locations and here, they do not consider impact
in traditional way, but they think they needed to take care
of citizens or trees or houses (typically in forest fires
or drought areas or floods or earthquakes or locations like
mines)
No one should ask or request for sharing their programmes
in global examples.
We either do it ourselves or take the help of larger (bigger
as well as global) organisations and donors
Corporates : We do not share corporate examples, corporates
Awards
We do not recommend any one for any award
|
