Global examples can be of different types.
Replicable : Programme which is already implemented and
shows impact.
Innovative : Programme which is innovative (We cant gurantee
that it never existed before)
Using technology : Programme which has used technology
(including AI) to save time, money, reachout
Sustainable : Programme which exists minimum for 5 years
No gurantee (but read till end to see great people)
Our former organisation did a research on credibility
of NGOs and we realised that it takes lot of time to do
research with NGO, its community and associated donors,
volunteers, related government people. Also, we realised
that many times, if founder leaves the organisation or
if the CEO of the organisation leaves, the credibility
suffers. We have also seen that the new CEO has shown
better performance or has easily left ageold practices
or used technology better to move faster or with digital
practices saves time, as well as saving petrol / diesel
and helped climate ....
Donors : Programme must see the credibility, intent, purpose
of financial donor (No gurantee).
Corruption : Programme implementing organisation does
not use corrupt practices with donors / government (We
can not give gurantee and donor should known who was the
donor of the organisation they are helping)
Impact : While we are keen on impact, we know that there
are many locations where the reachout is difficult and
the community members are far less. So it is not economical,
but government helps such locations and here, they do
not consider impact in traditional way, but they think
they needed to take care of citizens or trees or houses
(typically in forest fires or drought areas or floods
or earthquakes or locations like mines)
No one should ask or request for sharing their programmes
in global examples.
We either do it ourselves or take the help of larger (bigger
as well as global) organisations and donors
Corporates : We do not share corporate examples, corporates
Awards
We do not recommend any one for any award
|
