Global examples can be of different types.
Replicable : Programme which is already implemented
and shows impact.
Innovative : Programme which is innovative (We
cant gurantee that it never existed before)
Using technology : Programme which has used
technology (including AI) to save time, money,
reachout
Sustainable : Programme which exists minimum
for 5 years
No gurantee (but read till end to see great
people)
Our former organisation did a research on credibility
of NGOs and we realised that it takes lot of
time to do research with NGO, its community
and associated donors, volunteers, related government
people. Also, we realised that many times, if
founder leaves the organisation or if the CEO
of the organisation leaves, the credibility
suffers. We have also seen that the new CEO
has shown better performance or has easily left
ageold practices or used technology better to
move faster or with digital practices saves
time, as well as saving petrol / diesel and
helped climate ....
Donors : Programme must see the credibility,
intent, purpose of financial donor (No gurantee).
Corruption : Programme implementing organisation
does not use corrupt practices with donors /
government (We can not give gurantee and donor
should known who was the donor of the organisation
they are helping)
Impact : While we are keen on impact, we know
that there are many locations where the reachout
is difficult and the community members are far
less. So it is not economical, but government
helps such locations and here, they do not consider
impact in traditional way, but they think they
needed to take care of citizens or trees or
houses (typically in forest fires or drought
areas or floods or earthquakes or locations
like mines)
No one should ask or request for sharing their
programmes in global examples.
We either do it ourselves or take the help of
larger (bigger as well as global) organisations
and donors
Corporates : We do not share corporate examples,
corporates
Awards
We do not recommend any one for any award
|
