Global examples can be of different types.
Replicable : Programme which is already implemented
and shows impact.
Innovative : Programme which is innovative
(We cant gurantee that it never existed before)
Using technology : Programme which has used
technology (including AI) to save time, money,
reachout
Sustainable : Programme which exists minimum
for 5 years
No gurantee (but read till end to see great
people)
Our former organisation did a research on
credibility of NGOs and we realised that it
takes lot of time to do research with NGO,
its community and associated donors, volunteers,
related government people. Also, we realised
that many times, if founder leaves the organisation
or if the CEO of the organisation leaves,
the credibility suffers. We have also seen
that the new CEO has shown better performance
or has easily left ageold practices or used
technology better to move faster or with digital
practices saves time, as well as saving petrol
/ diesel and helped climate ....
Donors : Programme must see the credibility,
intent, purpose of financial donor (No gurantee).
Corruption : Programme implementing organisation
does not use corrupt practices with donors
/ government (We can not give gurantee and
donor should known who was the donor of the
organisation they are helping)
Impact : While we are keen on impact, we know
that there are many locations where the reachout
is difficult and the community members are
far less. So it is not economical, but government
helps such locations and here, they do not
consider impact in traditional way, but they
think they needed to take care of citizens
or trees or houses (typically in forest fires
or drought areas or floods or earthquakes
or locations like mines)
No one should ask or request for sharing their
programmes in global examples.
We either do it ourselves or take the help
of larger (bigger as well as global) organisations
and donors
Corporates : We do not share corporate examples,
corporates
Awards
We do not recommend any one for any
award
|
