Global examples can be of different types.
Replicable : Programme which is already
implemented and shows impact.
Innovative : Programme which is innovative
(We cant gurantee that it never existed
before)
Using technology : Programme which has
used technology (including AI) to save
time, money, reachout
Sustainable : Programme which exists minimum
for 5 years
No gurantee (but read till end to see
great people)
Our former organisation did a research
on credibility of NGOs and we realised
that it takes lot of time to do research
with NGO, its community and associated
donors, volunteers, related government
people. Also, we realised that many times,
if founder leaves the organisation or
if the CEO of the organisation leaves,
the credibility suffers. We have also
seen that the new CEO has shown better
performance or has easily left ageold
practices or used technology better to
move faster or with digital practices
saves time, as well as saving petrol /
diesel and helped climate ....
Donors : Programme must see the credibility,
intent, purpose of financial donor (No
gurantee).
Corruption : Programme implementing organisation
does not use corrupt practices with donors
/ government (We can not give gurantee
and donor should known who was the donor
of the organisation they are helping)
Impact : While we are keen on impact,
we know that there are many locations
where the reachout is difficult and the
community members are far less. So it
is not economical, but government helps
such locations and here, they do not consider
impact in traditional way, but they think
they needed to take care of citizens or
trees or houses (typically in forest fires
or drought areas or floods or earthquakes
or locations like mines)
No one should ask or request for sharing
their programmes in global examples.
We either do it ourselves or take the
help of larger (bigger as well as global)
organisations and donors
Corporates : We do not share corporate
examples, corporates
Awards
We do not recommend any one for
any award
|
