Global examples can be of different types.
Replicable : Programme which is already implemented
and shows impact.
Innovative : Programme which is innovative (We
cant gurantee that it never existed before)
Using technology : Programme which has used technology
(including AI) to save time, money, reachout
Sustainable : Programme which exists minimum for
5 years
No gurantee (but read till end to see great people)
Our former organisation did a research on credibility
of NGOs and we realised that it takes lot of time
to do research with NGO, its community and associated
donors, volunteers, related government people.
Also, we realised that many times, if founder
leaves the organisation or if the CEO of the organisation
leaves, the credibility suffers. We have also
seen that the new CEO has shown better performance
or has easily left ageold practices or used technology
better to move faster or with digital practices
saves time, as well as saving petrol / diesel
and helped climate ....
Donors : Programme must see the credibility, intent,
purpose of financial donor (No gurantee).
Corruption : Programme implementing organisation
does not use corrupt practices with donors / government
(We can not give gurantee and donor should known
who was the donor of the organisation they are
helping)
Impact : While we are keen on impact, we know
that there are many locations where the reachout
is difficult and the community members are far
less. So it is not economical, but government
helps such locations and here, they do not consider
impact in traditional way, but they think they
needed to take care of citizens or trees or houses
(typically in forest fires or drought areas or
floods or earthquakes or locations like mines)
No one should ask or request for sharing their
programmes in global examples.
We either do it ourselves or take the help of
larger (bigger as well as global) organisations
and donors
Corporates : We do not share corporate examples,
corporates
Awards
We do not recommend any one for any award
|