Global examples can be of different types.

Replicable : Programme which is already implemented and shows impact.
Innovative : Programme which is innovative (We cant gurantee that it never existed before)
Using technology : Programme which has used technology (including AI) to save time, money, reachout
Sustainable : Programme which exists minimum for 5 years


No gurantee (but read till end to see great people)
Our former organisation did a research on credibility of NGOs and we realised that it takes lot of time to do research with NGO, its community and associated donors, volunteers, related government people. Also, we realised that many times, if founder leaves the organisation or if the CEO of the organisation leaves, the credibility suffers. We have also seen that the new CEO has shown better performance or has easily left ageold practices or used technology better to move faster or with digital practices saves time, as well as saving petrol / diesel and helped climate ....
Donors : Programme must see the credibility, intent, purpose of financial donor (No gurantee).
Corruption : Programme implementing organisation does not use corrupt practices with donors / government (We can not give gurantee and donor should known who was the donor of the organisation they are helping)
Impact : While we are keen on impact, we know that there are many locations where the reachout is difficult and the community members are far less. So it is not economical, but government helps such locations and here, they do not consider impact in traditional way, but they think they needed to take care of citizens or trees or houses (typically in forest fires or drought areas or floods or earthquakes or locations like mines)


No one should ask or request for sharing their programmes in global examples.
We either do it ourselves or take the help of larger (bigger as well as global) organisations and donors
Corporates : We do not share corporate examples, corporates

Awards
We do not recommend any one for any award