Great people
Celebrities are brands. If people cant meet the celebrity they like one on one, they attend functions, events, award ceremonies where celebrities are present and like to take a photo with them. Some people go to the extent that they visit the location of the house of celebrities and even if they dont meet the celeb, they take their photo there.

But people dont know social doctors & dont value social doctors who almost donate their life to the social sector.
When PM or President of a country visits other country, she or he meets political leaders, business leaders, industry associations. But they dont have half an hour in their already tight schedule to meet 5 or 10 social greats who helped development of that country or addressed social challenges from which visiting person's country can benefit.
Agreed.

But they must have someone of their team (at minister level) to meet the social doctors for an hour or so, understand their work. Its not photo session. Its learning, understanding and appreciating session.

We are not myopic and short sighted and say great people are just from the social sector.
They can be from sports, film, business, philanthropist, scientist (infact CSRidentity.com thinks scientists whose work has global effect are global philanthropists), IQ test winners ... any celebrity who invests time (no, not invest time for photos) to promote any one social issue with great efforts. The celebs can be global, national, regional or even local level.

People think they have no time to read about them, forget about even thought of meeting them.
They dont want to waste their time & money. It is perfectly understandable because we have seen humans, their liking or disliking.

It is our responsibility to share their names (maybe links and 2 to 3 lines of some greats).

We share Great people at two levels (maybe 3 levels from April 2026)
Global greats : Global examples of people who through their organisation impact large number of people in the world or those who may impact far less numbers but whose extraordinary work needs global attention or whose work pattern is innovative.

National greats : People who are national greats (means those whose work is at national level)

Local greats : We will decide if we can share their name from April 2026

Please do not recommend any name unless asked.
And we are clear money can buy greatness through advertising or PR (both are good) but money cant buy sustainable greatness. So please do not even communicate that you can give money to us or donate to any NGO and in return, share name of a person who may not deserve it. We are a social enterprise or not money minded organisation.

We will approach
CSRidentity.com will approach well known organisations (Donors, NGOs, Celebs, Award giving organisations) to recommend names of great people (Again, there is no cost to them), so that we can share them and also share the name of the organisation which recommended them, so that if anyone has any query, they can directly contact them)

Awards
We do not recommend any one for any award because then the work of others we share gets less attention and we also dont want any bias. CSR Consulting (or parent organisation) may consult but not CSRidentity.com

Bhau
Founder exist to share social gods only because Bhau and others postponed his death on 28.08.2013

Past is shared last but good past lasts forever
Great persons work hard (intelligently) and think that the challenge they addressed expires.
But if we dont share names of great persons who have expired, we will make unpardonable mistake.
Every country has greats who left mother earth long time back but people remember and repect them.
People think God lives eternally. So do we think these Social Gods may leave mother earth physically but their contribution has eternal existance. e.g. In Social gods in Agriculture if we dont include M S Swaminathan who was global leader of the green revolution but left mother earth on 28 September 2023, it is not right. So we share present as well as past gods and may not write Late M S Swaminathan because he exists in his contribution form.